Robert F. Kennedy Jr., running as an independent presidential candidate, has accused the Democratic National Committee (DNC) of using “lawfare” to undermine his campaign after a judge ruled that he falsely claimed a New York residence on his nominating petitions. The decision by Judge Christina Ryba invalidates the documents Kennedy needed to secure a spot on New York’s ballot, potentially setting a precedent for challenges in other states.
Kennedy expressed his frustration on social media, stating, “This case is an assault on New York voters who signed in record numbers to place me on their ballot.” He further accused the DNC of substituting legal maneuvers for the democratic process, vowing to appeal the ruling and predicting victory.
The case was initiated by the Democrat-aligned group Clear Choice Action, which argued that Kennedy’s use of a friend’s suburban New York address did not meet the state’s residency requirements. Judge Ryba agreed, noting that merely using an address for political purposes without substantial presence does not fulfill residency criteria under New York Election Law. “To hold otherwise would establish a dangerous precedent,” Ryba wrote.
Kennedy’s campaign responded by highlighting his longstanding ties to New York, including his voter registration, tax payments, legal practice, and various licenses. They also criticized Judge Ryba for refusing to consider the constitutionality of New York’s residency requirements under the 12th Amendment, which governs the residency of presidential candidates.
Kennedy’s legal team plans to seek injunctive relief in the Southern District of New York, arguing that federal courts must protect voters’ rights when state courts disregard constitutional principles. Despite the setback, Kennedy’s campaign remains confident, having recently announced that they have secured enough signatures to appear on the ballot in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
